I have a Dream Act

President Obama took a step today toward some fashion of immigration reform.In reality, it was not a huge step, but enough to sharply mark the difference between the two parties today on the issue of immigration policy. Best I can tell, the primary criticism of the president is that his move was political. Really? Are the actions of the Republicans to repeatedly take the country to the brink over the debt-limit non-political? It’s an election year for goodness sake. Everything is political; that’s just part of life here in America.

The more interesting analysis is an examination of the issues each party decides to make political: same-sex marriage, tax policy, regulation of Wall Street, environmental policy, and in this case, immigration. I think what likely has the Republicans in a tither about what Obama did was that it reveals a split between the severe right wing of the Republican Party and what’s left of the Republican centrists. Obama’s new policy puts his opponents between the proverbial rock and a hard place. If the party line continues to turn its back on the millions of undocumented people here, who work to keep our economy functioning, then Republicans stand little chance of capturing any of the Latino vote in November. Some in the party, like Rubio, understand this is untenable, but on this one, he is not likely to carry the day. Romney abandoned his previous more moderate stance and veered sharply to the right to capture the primary victory. Despite the obvious hypocrisy of now moving back to the center, I hope he makes the right “political” move and does just that. Time will tell. In the meantime, I congratulate the president for his political move.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to I have a Dream Act

  1. Bill Aitken '64 says:

    Dear dreamer Larry,
    Hope you have had a chance to read Fareer Zakaria’s Time magazine (June 18, pp. 24&25) commentary on US immigration policy, “Broken & Obsolete”. Especially interesting are his views on the role of immigrants (legal and illegal) in filling the positions of the unemployable unemployed, and the near-zero (and perhaps reversing) net Mexican immigration of the moment. Looks to me like the choice in Nov. is between a candidate who has not had a chance to prove his policies due of the nearly universal opposition of “The Party of No”, and one representing the party views of those who got us in the economic mess we find ourselves in today (and the last 16 years) in the first place The latter is only my opinion, of course (not part of Zakaria’s commentary).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s